Post July 4th – Analysis and Moving Forward
In all, we had a good event. To clarify, we were trying to unite people across the political spectrum against excessive taxation and the bailouts. You can watch some of the event here.
Also, to clarify, we were NOT trying to promote candidates. This was made clear to all the candidates before they arrived and in the Q and A posted before the event. Let it be made clear again.
In Hartford, we got as many people involved as we could. Many requests were added at the last minute and incorporated successfully. We had speakers across the spectrum, but we tried to stay focused on the bailout and excessive taxes.
With infrequent but acute (probably inevitable) deviations into the drug war, abortion, immigration, ect., we largely succeeded. We also succeeded in establishing a consensus that this is, in fact, a two party problem. One person even chimed in “what two parties” because they are the same one.
Unfortunately, those side issues had the potential to and did create some division, and I think an equal result could be created by controlling such an event too much by interjecting too many progressive, or as one termed it “naderite” speakers. On the other hand, those we could call “naderites” do agree that spending and taxation are out of control.
As a Libertarian, I find many of their positions downright insane, but recognize that we need a unified effort lest this become a “rah rah GOP” event where we throw the Democrats out only to be left with similar, albeit more severe degrees of the same result… kind of like when we threw out the GOP in 2006. And the joke really was on the Democrats when it came to the war, reckless spending, the economy and reading the legislation voted on in general.
The discussion, which was something I had aimed for in organizing the Hartford, CT event, did evolve into ideas on what we could do about the situation. On the whole, it was very positive. 1,000 (at peak) isn’t as many as I’d like, and there can never be too many for something that should have happened 80 years ago, but it was far better than the 100 most of us involved expected on a July 4th holiday.
Due to partisan concerns, I ended with some of Washington’s remarks from 1796 -
“But the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea of the power and the right of the people to establish Government presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the established Government.
All obstructions to the execution of the Laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation, the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels, and modified by mutual interests.”
Before this and similar events, the Tea Party movement was already marginalizing itself by not only focusing on Republicans, but just about any Republican it could find or who sought audience. The case and point here in Connecticut is Rob Simmons, former congressman running for senate and co-conspirator in tripling the size of government. When asked if I would welcome him to speak, I stopped short of saying “Why not invite Chris Dodd, or for that matter, Barack Obama?”
His game, like Dodd’s relies on ordinary people remaining divided, codependent and enslaved to “voting the rascals out” as Carroll Quigley described in Tragedy and Hope. Pay close attention to this particular senate race - the two party (one party) system needs it to survive. Hands down, the Dan Reale guarantee is that the special interests funding both will use Tea Party and other movements in an attempt to –
1) Fund both under the color of difference, Simmons through the Tea Parties and Dodd through racist/right-wing labeling of the tea parties
2) Use attack ads and whisper campaigns in tandem with the first item for the same purpose
3) Focus everyone on the most divisive issues possible, such as abortion, religion, immigration, gay marriage and the drug war to obstruct unity against unprecedented theft
4) Reinforce the illusion that both parties are somehow different
5) Increase inflation, spending and taxes when the previous items work - after the rascals are thrown out
There are some people who execute those objectives without knowing, usually through buying into carefully targeted media campaigns executed by those with some idea. Ultimately, those really in the know donate the most to both major parties – campaign finance rules don’t apply and/or Jim Crow laws in campaign finance for the average voter.
An excellent example is Goldman Sachs -
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/28816321/the_great_american_bubble_machine/print
They are asking whether the Democrats or the Republicans will fully implement the carbon offset bubble. We should answer the question of whether it will be implemented or not by exposing the game and finding common ground.
Both parties do not want we the people coming together and truly ending their card game, a game where drunks in Washington gamble with our money instead of having the decency to do it in a casino with their own money. We threw the Democrats out in 1994 for fiscal recklessness and other reasons. Then we threw the Republicans out in 2006 for fiscal recklessness and other reasons. Now, we’re told to throw the Democrats out again as if the Republicans are different, for the same things, as if this is the answer.
As a citizen, I’d like to tell the truth. And I’m not saying it as someone working with Reteaparty.com. I’m saying it as Dan Reale. If throwing the Democrats out for the Republicans is your only answer after coming together like we have, as Americans above partisanship, then you have not been taxed enough. That’s after years of being schooled in the kind of theft, the kinds of lies those at the top of both parties perpetuate against we the people.
Every time that approach off shored jobs, it was a tax. Every time that approach increased healthcare costs, separated families and sent young men and women to wars predicated on a lie; that was a tax. Every permit, form, license, fee and application taxed your time. Every decision in your personal affairs was a tax. Every year that tired, failed and faithfully repetitious solution destroyed your purchasing power through the Federal Reserve was a tax. If you aren’t tired of working for government for half of your existence, you have not been taxed enough. Comes now the cap and traitors, unwitting servants of special interests the Republicans could have stopped. They will tax you and every facet of your earthly existence even more.
That’s not extreme. That’s a measured and accurate response to swarms of officers eating out my substance, your substance and the substance of generations yet to come.
I need no counsel or advice from those who continue subscribing to the same answer that produced slavery, gave them a master and made them servants. They clearly want a master and deserve one. I wish them well, including my desire that their shackles fit comfortably and that they look favorably upon the tasks set before them.
I am never too afraid of any greater evil or chances of success to object. If I do not give it my all, if you do not give it your all, if we the people do not give it our all; we’re done. There will be no United States of America if we don’t.
Going forward, there will be future events. I’m tentatively shooting for Constitution Day, which is September 17th. We’ll be incorporating comedy. Half of the event will be audience participation. We have yet to decide upon a location.
What I have decided is that we are taxed enough. Those taxes in all forms exceed constitutional limits. The Constitution isn’t a suggestion – it’s the law of the land ordained and established by we the people.
